Biomass of beech (Fagus L.) and ash (Fraxinus L.) depending on tree height, crown width and average January temperature in Eurasia
https://doi.org/10.21266/2079-4304.2022.238.23-48
Abstract
Remote registration of such taxation indicators of trees as crown width and tree height has become widespread in assessing the biomass of trees. There are many allometric models of the biomass of different tree species in different climatic conditions, but for the assessment of biomass by remote methods, they are presented in single publications. The authors used the experimental data base of 249 and 78 model trees of Fagus spp. and Fraxinus spp. correspondingly with measured indicators of tree height, crown width, as well as the biomass of trunk, foliage, branches and roots. For all components of aboveground biomass, a positive relationship was established with the crown width and the tree height. Two-input tables for the taxation of the biomass of two genera are compiled. The results obtained give an idea of how much the biomass structure of equal-sized trees of such species as beech and ash can differ, whether this structure can change in the winter temperature gradient of Eurasia, and what can be the contribution of the climate variable to the explanation of the variability of tree biomass.
About the Authors
V. A. Usoltsev
Ural State Forest Engineering University, chief researcher at the Botanical Garden, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
USOLTSEV Vladimir A. – DSc (Agriculture), professor of the Department of Forestry
620100. Sibirskiy Trakt. 37. Yekaterinburg
I. S. Tsepordey
Botanical Garden of Ural Branch of RAS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
TSEPORDEY Ivan S. – PhD (Agriculture), scientist
620144. 8 Marta str. 202a. Yekaterinburg
V. F. Kovyazin
Saint-Petersburg Mining University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
KOVIAZIN Vasiliy F. – DSc (Biology), Рrofessor
199106. 21 line V.O. 2. St. Petersburg
References
1. The Law of St. Petersburg No. 430-85 «On public green spaces» dated 19.09.2007 (accessed November 20, 2021). (In Russ.)
2. «Dubki» Park, Saint Petersburg. URL: https://parkdubki.ru (accessed December 29, 2021). (In Russ.)
3. Agakhayants P.F., Karpov A.S. Green spaces in St. Petersburg. St. Petersburg: RNO Center, 2003. 63 p. (In Russ.)
4. Bulygin N.E., Veretennikova G.A., Reshetnyak V.N. Report on the research work «Dendroinventarization of the park «Dubki». His geobotanical survey and development of recommendations for the preservation of oaks of historical value». LT. L., 1978, no. 3117. 26 p. (In Russ.)
5. Fedorets N.G., Medvedeva M.V. Methods of soil research in urbanized territories. Petrozavodsk: KarSC RAS. 2009. 84 p. (In Russ.)
6. Kachinsky N.A. Water-physical properties and regimes of soils. M.: Higher School, 1970. 359 p. (In Russ.)
7. Kapelkina L.P. Ecological features of the soils of St. Petersburg // Environmental safety. Scientific and informational bulletin, 2007, no. 1-2 (17–18), pp. 48–56. (In Russ.)
8. Kiseleva K.V., Novikov V.S., Mayorov S.R. Determinant of trees and shrubs of the middle zone of Russia. M.: Phyton. 2020. 228 p. (In Russ.)
9. Kolesnikov A.I. Decorative dendrology. M.: Forest industry, 1974. 704 p. (In Russ.)
10. Kovyazin V.F. Limiting factors of soil fertility of St. Petersburg: materials of scientific th. International. Academy of Sciences of Ecology and Life Safety. St. Petersburg: MANEB Publishing House, 2008. Part 2, pp. 114–118. (In Russ.)
11. Kovyazin V.F. The state of phytocenosis of the park «Dubki». XXI century. Youth, education, ecology, noosphere. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of St. Petersburg State University, 2001, р. 142144. (In Russ.)
12. Kovyazin V.F., Belyaeva N.V. Assessment of plant biodiversity of megalopolis ecosystem plantings. Biodiversity. Problems and prospects of conservation. Penza. PGPU, 2008, рp. 236–238. (In Russ.)
13. Kovyazin V.F., Demidova P.M. Nguyen Thi Thui. Establishment of the area of elements of landscape gardening with the use of GIS technologies. Proceedings of the St. Petersburg Forestry Academy, 2018, iss. 225, pp. 6–16. (In Russ.)
14. Kovyazin V.F., Shabnov V.M., Martynov A.N. et al. Monitoring of soil and plant resources in the ecosystems of St. Petersburg. St. Petersburg. St. Petersburg State University, 2010. 344 p. (In Russ.)
15. KrasilnikovP.V., Targulyan V.O. On the way to the «New geography of soils»: challenges and solutions. Soil science, 2019, no. 2, pp. 131–139. (In Russ.)
16. Malysheva N.V., Nikolaev P.M., Reiman A.L., Neshataev V.Yu. History of creation and current state of Sestroretsk Park «Dubki» (based on lichenoindication, phytopathological and phytocenotic analyses). Bulletin of St. Petersburg University, 1995, ser. 3, no. 2. pp. 46–51. (In Russ.)
17. Matinyan N.N., Rusakov A.V. Soils of St. Petersburg. Three centuries of St. Petersburg. Encyclopedia. In 3 vol. Vol. II. The nineteenth century. Book five. Publishing House of the Philological Faculty of St. Petersburg State University, 2006, pp. 570–573. (In Russ.)
18. Melnichuk I.A. Hydrological regime of seaside parks of St. Petersburg. Aquaterra. 2006. 9th International conference. St. Petersburg, 2006, pp. 86–90. (In Russ.)
19. Rastvorova O.G. Sestroretsk «Oaks» from Peter I to the present day. Historical and natural history research. St. Petersburg, 2004. 125 p. (In Russ.)
20. Stroganova M.N., Agarkova M.G. Urban soils: the experience of studying and systematics (on the example of the south-western part of Moscow). Bulletin of Moscow. un-ta. Ser. 17, soil science, 1992, no. 7, pp. 16–24. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Usoltsev V.A., Tsepordey I.S., Kovyazin V.F. Biomass of beech (Fagus L.) and ash (Fraxinus L.) depending on tree height, crown width and average January temperature in Eurasia. Izvestia Sankt-Peterburgskoj lesotehniceskoj akademii. 2022;(238):23-48. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21266/2079-4304.2022.238.23-48
Views:
59
Email this article 