Interaction between birds and technical linear structures
https://doi.org/10.21266/2079-4304.2024.247.154-172
Abstract
On the base of analysis of the best international practice and original observations the influence of different linear technogenic objects on birds is evaluated – such as railways and roads, bridges, power lines, hydraulic structures, fences and barriers, artificially planted vegetation, as well as elements of accompanying infrastructure (telephone and telegraph poles, lighting elements, etc.). Factors of positive and negative effects of the linear technogenic objects on the ornithofauna are revealed. It is shown that the anthropogenic effects on ornithofauna should be estimated as a complex, on the base of the system approach – as well as the linear objects themselves, which represent a complex consisting of the linear object proper and accompanying infrastructure.
About the Authors
M. B. Shilin
Murmansk Arctic University (MAU)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
SHILIN Mikhail B. – DSc (Geographical), PhD (Biological), leading scientific fellow, professor
183038. Kapitana Egorova str. 15. Murmansk. Russia
J. A. Lednova
Murmansk Arctic University (MAU)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
LEDNOVA Julia A. – PhD (Geographical), senior researcher
183038. Kapitana Egorova str. 15. Murmansk. Russia
M. J. Menshakova
Murmansk Arctic University (MAU)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
MENSHAKOVA Maria Ju. – PhD (Biological), head of the Laboratory «Monitoring and preservation of natural ecosystems of the Arctic»
183038. Kapitana Egorova str. 15. Murmansk. Russia
R. I. Gaynanova
Murmansk Arctic University (MAU)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
GAYNANOVA Ramzija I. – research fellow at the Laboratory «Monitoring and preservation of natural ecosystems of the Arctic»
183038. Kapitana Egorova str. 15. Murmansk. Russia
E. A. Rumjantseva
Murmansk Arctic University (MAU)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
RUMIANTCEVA Ekaterina A. – PhD (Physical and Mathematical Sciences), senior researcher
183038. Kapitana Egorova str. 15. Murmansk. Russia
References
1. Duajer D.F. Rasshirenie zashity pernatyh hishnikov za schet predotvrashenija stolknovenij i upravlenija elektropodstanzijami. Pernatye hishniki i ih ohrana, 2023, specvyp. 2, pp. 411–412. DOI: 10.19074/1814-8654-2023-2-411-412. (In Russ.)
2. Branoff B., Cerqueira M.C. The Role of Urbanness, Vegetation Structure, and Scale in Shaping Puerto Rico’s Acoustically Active Mangrove Fauna Communities, July 2021. Frontiers in Marine Science, 8: 670288, DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2021.670288. Citcer V.V., Andreev O.B. Pticezashitnye ustrojstva dljz vozgyshnyh LEP i podstanzij – problema monitoringa i ocenki effectivnosti pticezashitnyh meroprijatij. Pernatye hishniki i ih ohrana, specvyp. 2, 2023, pp. 413–418. DOI: 10.190 74/ 1814-8654-2023-2-413-418. (In Russ.)
3. Collins Bird Guide, The Most Complete Guide to the Birds of Britain and Europe. 2-nd ed. Milano, Graphicom, 2006. 400 p.
4. Dean W.R.J, Milton S.J. Directed dispersal of Opuntia species in the Karoo, South Africa: are crows the responsible agents? Journal of Arid Environments, 2000, 45 (4), рр. 305–314. DOI: 10.1006/jare.2000.0652.
5. Dean W.R.J., Seymour С.L, Joseph G.S. Linear structures in the Karoo, South Africa, and their impacts on biota. African Journal of Range & Forage Science, 2018, vol. 35, iss. 3–4, рр. 223–232. DOI: 10.2989/10220119.2018.1514530.
6. Dwyer J.F., Dalla Rosa J.P. Use of Anthropogenic Nest Substrates by Crested Caracaras. Southeastern Naturalist, 2015, 14(1), N10-N15. DOI: 10.1656/058.014.0105. Fedorov M.P., Shilin М.B., Gorbunov N.E. Ekologicheskie osnovy upravlenija prirodno-technicheskimi sistemami. SPb.: Izd-vo Polytechn. un-ty, 2007. 506 p. (In Russ.)
7. Fedorov M.P., Zhigulsky V.A., Chusov A.N., Shilin M.B. Ekologija dlja gidrotechnikov. SPb.: Polytechnical university, 2023. 214 p. (In Russ.)
8. Fedorov М.P., Shilin М.B., Кluikov Ye.Yu., Lukjanov S.V. Kontrol ekologicheskoj bezopasnosti farvaterov krupnotonnazhnyh tankerov v Arctice. Osvoenie shelfa arkticheskih morej Rosii : dok. 3 Mezhdunar. konf. SPb.: ZNII А.N. Кrylova, 1997, pp. 459–460. (In Russ.)
9. Frantzen B., Guenther М., Potorochin Е., Solntseva Y., Dylyuk S., Ganusevich S., Krasnova Е., Мaeland А., Hauge E., Horn К.-S., Barret R., Kaljakin М., Ezhov А., Vishnevskiy Е., Gaynanova R., Polikarpova N., Tolmacheva Е., Shutova Е. Birding across the border. SPb., 2020. 140 p.
10. Havlin J. On the importance of railway lines for the life of avifauna in agrocoenoses. Folia Zoologica, 1987, vol. 364, pp. 345–358.
11. Iovchenko N.P. Monitoring formirovanija ornithofauny i sostojanija redkikh vidov ptiz na Komplekse zashitnykh sooruzhenij Sankt-Peterburga ot navodnenij. Prirodnye I kulturnye resursy v ecosystemakh Petergofa / red. D.V. Osipov, D.Ju. Vlasov. SPb.: ВВМ, 2016, pp. 37–60. (In Russ.)
12. Iovchenko N.P. Rolj Kompleksa zashitnykh sooruzhenij Sankt-Peterburga ot navodnenij v sokhranenii bioraznoobrazija i redkikh vidov ptiz Baltijskogo regiona. Rus. Ornithol zhurnal, 2012, vol. 21, no. 825, pp. 3125–3139. (In Russ.)
13. Iovchenko N.P. The Saint Petersburg Flood Protection Barrier as new habitats for biodiversity and rare bird species conservation in the Gulf of Finland. Thesis Collection: XVI International Environmental Forum «Baltic Sea Day» (18–20 March 2015, St. Petersburg), 2015, pp. 266–268.
14. Kolnegari M., Hazrati M., Tehrani V.K., Dwyer J.F. Crowd-sourced reporting of birds nesting on power lines in Iran. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 2022, vol. 46, iss. 4, e1336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.1336.
15. Kouzov S.A., Shilin M.B., Chusov A.N. Raznoobrazie i ujazvimostj ornitofauny v rajone morskogo gazoprovoda «Nordstrim». Uchenye zapiski RGGMU, 2013, no. 31, pp. 120–137. (In Russ.)
16. Malo J.E., García de la Morena E.L., Hervás I., Cristina Mata C., Herranz J. 2017. Cross-scale changes in bird behavior around a high speed railway: from landscape occupation to infrastructure use and collision risk. In: Borda-de-Água L., Barrientos R., Beja P., Pereira H.M. (eds), Railway ecology. Cham: Springer Nature. pp 117–134. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-57496-7_8.
17. Morelli F., Beim M., Jerzak L., Jones D., Tryjanowski P. 2014. Can roads, railways and related structures have positive effects on birds? – A review. Transportation Research Part D 30: 21–31. DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2014.05.006.
18. Múrias T., Gonçalves D., Lopes R.J. Evaluating the impacts of a new railway on shorebirds: a case study in central Portugal (Aveiro Lagoon). Railway ecology / eds. L. Borda-de-Água, R. Barrientos, P. Beja, H.M. Pereira. Cham: Springer Nature, 2017, chapter 12, рр. 197–214. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-57496-7_12
19. Panov I.А. Eco-NIOKR – 18 let dlja ohrany ptiz na objectah elektrosetevogo kompleksa Rossii. Pernatye hishniki i ih ohrana, specvyp. 2, 2023, pp. 419–424. DOI: 10.190 74/ 1814-8654-2023-2-419-424. (In Russ.)
20. Ravkin Е.S., Chelintsev N.G. Меthodicheskie rekomendazii po kompleksnomu marshrutnomu uchetu ptiz. М.: Izd. VNII Priroda, 1990. 93 p. (In Russ.)
21. Sagitov R.A., Shilin M.B. Na sushe i na more. Mirovaja energetika, 2007, no. 11 (47), pp. 33–34. (In Russ.)
22. Shilin M., Abramov V., Zhigulsky V., Ershova A. Geo-ecological support of optimization for for the route of the Nordstream-2 marine gas pipeline. 18th Int. Multidiscip. Sc. GeoConference SGEM 2018, Varna, Bulgaria, pp. 423–430.
23. Shilin M., Chusov A., Lednova J., Kouzov S. Variety and vulnerability of waterbird community in the easgtern part of the Gulf of Finland in the zone of
24. «Nordstream» gas pipeline. Baltic Int. Symposium (BALTIC) 2014 IEEE/OES, Tallinn. DOI: 10.1109/BALTIC.2014.6887863, pp. 1-6.
25. Shilin M., Chusov A., Lednova J., Kouzov S. Variety and vulnerability of waterbird community in the easgtern part of the Gulf of Finland in the zone of
26. «Nordstream» gas pipeline. Baltic Int. Symposium (BALTIC), 2014 IEEE/OES, Tallinn. DOI: 10.1109/BALTIC.2014.6887863, pp. 1–6.
27. Shilin M.B., Lebedeva O.V., Kouzov S.A., Bashkina G.I. Sostojanie ornitofauny na trasse «Severnogo potoka»: projavljaetsja li vozdejstvie morskogo gazoprovoda. Gidrotechnika, 2013, 1(30), pp. 4–8. (In Russ.)
28. Shilin М.B., Menshakova M.Ju., Gajnanova R.I., Lednova Ju.A., Rumjantseva
29. E.A. Vodno-bolotnaja ornitofauna beregovoj zony Kolskogo zaliva Barentseva morja v rajone krupnogo technogennogo objecta – mosta cherez Kolskij zaliv. Morja Rossii: vyzovy otechestvennoj nauki : tezisy dokladov Vserossijskoj nauchnoj konferenzii (26– 30 sentjabrja 2022, Sevastopol), 2022, рр. 368–369. (In Russ.)
30. Shnajder E.P., Nikolenko E.G., Karjakin I.V. Gibel ptic na LEP v Respublike Hakasija (Rossia) v 2020 g. Pernatye hishniki i ih ohrana, 2020, 41, рр. 26–63 (In Russ.)
31. Svensson L. Collins Bird Guide. Harper Collins (UK), 2009. 416 p.
32. White C.M., Boyce D.A. Notes on Mountain Caracara (Phalcoboenus megalopterus) in the Argentine puna. Wilson Bulletin, 1986, 99, рр. 283–284.
33. Zhigulsky V.A., Shuisky V.F., Chebykina E.Yu., Fedorov V.A., Panichev V.V., Uspenskiy A.A., Zhigulskaya D.V., Bylina T.S., Bulysheva М.М., Bulysheva А.М. Macrophyte thicket ecosystems of the Neva Bay. St. Petersburg: Renome, 2020. 304 p. (In Russ.)
34. Оngarbaev N.H. Predlozenija po zakonodatelnomy resheniju problem gibeli ptiz na vozdushnyh linijah elektroperedach v Kazachstane. Pernatye hishniki i ih ohrana, 2023, specvyp. 2, pp. 395–399. DOI: 10.190 74/ 1814-8654-2023-2-395-399. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Shilin M.B., Lednova J.A., Menshakova M.J., Gaynanova R.I., Rumjantseva E.A. Interaction between birds and technical linear structures. Izvestia Sankt-Peterburgskoj lesotehniceskoj akademii. 2024;1(247):154-172. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21266/2079-4304.2024.247.154-172
Views:
105
Email this article 