Effects of felling residues reinforcement of the strip roads on soil damage after logging operations in the northern taiga subzone
https://doi.org/10.21266/2079-4304.2024.249.22-37
Abstract
For the conditions of cutting areas with excessive soil moisture, it is important to determine the possibilities of protecting them with a brush mats of felling residues on strip roads when felling low-bonity tree stands. This is necessary to adjust the technological parameters of the development of cutting areas in the northern taiga subzone (Arkhangelsk region) due to the vulnerability of the soil and vegetation cover. Within the boundaries of the cutting area, which was developed by a complex of logging machinery, we selected plots with 4 forwarder passages loaded with 20 m3 of spruce and birch assortments. The initial area of the forest was represented by blueberry spruce of the V class of bonitet, the stand composition was 80 percent represented by spruce, 20 percent by birch, and pine was a single, growing on soils with binomial deposits (the top of the profile is sandy loam, the bottom is silty clay). We conducted a detailed study of the structure of the ruts, opened the soil and made a description of the horizons / soil layers, determined the moisture, penetration resistance and bulk density in the thickness of 0-20 cm. As a control, we selected similar samples at the cutting strips. The laboratory determined the particle density and calculated the total porosity and porosity of aeration. It was found that the use of felling residues in the amount of 0.008 m3/m2, which is typical for this forest type, with a minimum number of vehicle passes does not exclude the negative consequences of damage to the soil and vegetation cover, but is able to minimize them. First of all, this excludes the formation of ruts in the places where loaded vehicles passed. The negative impact is manifested in the compaction of the forest floor, however, a brush mats of felling residues protects the 20-cm - thickness of the soil from compaction and disturbance of the water-air regime, compared with the ruts on strip roads without felling residues. With a larger number of vehicle passes, the available thickness of the felling residues may not be enough, and the damage may be higher.
About the Authors
A. S. IlintsevRussian Federation
Aleksey S. Ilintsev - PhD (Agriculture), Senior researcher, Northern Research Institute of Forestry.
Nikitova str. 13, Arkhangelsk, 163062
WoS ResercherID N-6286-2019, AuthorlD 849116
E. N. Nakvasina
Russian Federation
Elena N. Nakvasina - DSc (Agriculture), Professor, Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov.
Severnaya Dvina emb. 17, Arkhangelsk, 163062
WoS ResercherID A-5165-2013, ScopusID 35389250000, AuthorID 132027
References
1. Ampoorter E., Schrijver A., Nevel L., Hermy M., Verheyen K. Impact of mechanized harvesting on compaction of sandy and clayey forest soils: results of a meta-analysis. Annals of Forest Science, 2012, vol. 69, pp. 543-562. DOI: 10.1007/s13595-012-0199-y
2. Cambi M., Certini G., Fabiano F., Foderi C., Laschi A., Picchio R. Impact of wheeled and tracked tractors on soil physical properties in a mixed conifer stand. iForest, 2015, vol. 9, pp. 89-94. DOI: 10.3832/ifor1382-008
3. Druchinin D.Yu. Povrezhdenie lesnoj pochvenno-rastitel'noj sredy pri provedenii lesozagotovitel'nyh rabot [Damage to the forest soil and plant environment after logging operations]. Lesozagotovitel'noe proizvodstvo: problemy i resheniya: materialy Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-tekhnicheskoj konferencii [Logging production: problems and solutions: materials of the International Scientific and Technical Conference]. Minsk: BGTU, 2017. pp. 84-87. (In Russ.)
4. Ezzati S., Najafi A., Rab M.A., Zenner E.K. Recovery of soil bulk density, porosity and rutting from ground skidding over a 20-year period after timber harvesting in Iran. Silva Fennica, 2012, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 521-538. DOI: 10.14214/sf.908
5. Galaktionov O.N., Kuznetsov A.V. Formirovanie struktury lesotransportnyh putej lesoseki na lesotipologicheskoj osnove. Uchenye zapiski petrozavodskogo state university, 2011, no. 8, pp. 81-84. (In Russ.)
6. Galaktionov O.N., Kuznetsov A.V., Piskunov M.A. Harakteristiki nastila iz lesosechnyh othodov i sostoyanie grunta na trelevochnom voloke. Uchenye Zapiski petrozavodskogo state university, 2009, no. 7, pp. 90-95. (In Russ.)
7. Grigor'ev I.V., Zhukova A.I., Grigor'eva O.I., Ivanov A.V. Sredoshchadyashchie tekhnologii razrabotki lesosek v usloviyah Severo-Zapadnogo regiona Rossijskoj Federacii: monografiya. SPb.: Izd-vo SPbGLTA, 2008. 317 p. (In Russ.)
8. Ilintsev A., Bogdanov A., Nakvasina E., Amosova I., Koptev S., Tretyakov S. The natural recovery of disturbed soil, plant cover and trees after clear-cutting in the Boreal Forests, Russia. iForest, 2020, vol. 13, pp. 531-540. DOI: 10.3832/ifor3371-013
9. Ilintsev A., Nakvasina E., Tretyakov S., Koptev S., Bogdanov A. The impact of modern logging on the forest environment of felling site in the context of climate change [Electronic resource]. Building a green, healthy and resilient future with forests: XV World Forestry Congress; 2-6 May 2022, Seoul, Republic of Korea. URL: https://drive.google.com/file/d/190XjPT5JO83nfr-aQl-UWhW1MkE9qG7D/view?usp%20target= (accessed November 10, 2023)
10. Ilintsev A.S., Nakvasina E.N. Rut formation after the passage of logging machinery in spruce forests on binomial soils. Izvestia Sankt-Peterburgskoj Lesotehniceskoj Akademii, 2021, iss. 237, pp. 168-182. DOI: 10.21266/2079¬4304.2021.237.168-182 (In Russ.)
11. Ilintsev A.S., Nakvasina E.N., Hogbom L. Methods of protection forest soils during logging operations. IVUZ. Lesnoy Zhurnal, 2021, no. 5, pp. 92-116. DOI: 10.37482/0536-1036-2021-5-92-116
12. Katarov V.K., Syunyov V.S., Rat'kova E.I., Gerasimov Yu. Vliyanie forvarderov na lesnye pochvogrunty. Resources and Technology, 2012, no. 9 (2), pp. 73-81. (In Russ.)
13. Kulyashov A.P., Kolotilin V.E. Ekologichnost' dvizhitelej transportno-tekhnologicheskih mashin [Environmental friendliness of movers of transport and technological machines.]. M.: Mashinostroenie Publ., 1993. 286 p. (In Russ.)
14. Latterini F., Dyderski M.K., Horodecki P., Rawlik M., Stefanoni W., Hogbom L., Venanzi R., Picchio R., Jagodzinski A.M. A Meta-analysis of the effects of ground-based extraction technologies on fine roots in forest soils. Land Degradation and Development, 2023, pp. 1-13. DOI: 10.1002/ldr.4902
15. Naghdi R., Solgi A., Zenner E., Najafi A., Salehi A., Nikooy M. Compaction of forest soils with heavy logging machinery. Silva Balcanica, 2017, vol. 18, pp. 25-39.
16. Nakvasina E.N., Lyubova S.V. Pochvovedenie: ucheb. posobie. [Soil science: textbook]. Arkhangelsk: SAFU Publ., 2016. 146 p. (In Russ.)
17. Nakvasina E.N., Seryj V.S., Semenov B.A. Polevoj praktikum po pochvovedeniyu [Field workshop on soil science]. Arkhangelsk: Arkhang. State Technical University Publ., 2007. 127 p. (In Russ.)
18. Nazari M, Arthur E., Lamande M, Keller T, Bilyera N, Bickel S. A meta-analysis of soil susceptibility to machinery-induced compaction in forest ecosystems across global climatic zones. Current Forestry Reports, 2023, pp. 1-12. DOI: 10.1007/s40725-023-00197-y
19. Seryj V.S., Anikeyeva V.A., Vyalykh N.I., Kubrak N.I. Izmenenie lesorastitel'nyh uslovij vyrubok pri sovremennyh lesozagotovkah [Changing Forest Site of Cuttings in Modern Logging]. Proceedings of Environmental Studies in the Forests of the European North, Arkhangelsk, AILiLKh Publ., 1991 pp. 3-15. (In Russ.)
20. Shabani S. Modelling and mapping of soil damage caused by harvesting in Caspian forests (Iran) using CART and RF data mining techniques. Journal of Forest Science, 2017, vol. 63, pp. 425-432. DOI: 10.17221/125/2016-JFS
21. Siegel-Issem C.M., Burger J.A., Powers R.F., Ponder F., Patterson S.C. Seedling root growth as a function of soil density and water content. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2005, vol. 69, pp. 215-226. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2005.0215
22. Siren M, Ala-Ilomaki J., Lindeman H, Uusitalo J, Kiilo K.E.K., Salmivaara A., Ryynanen A. Soil disturbance by cut-to-length machinery on mid-grained soils. Silva Fennica, 2019, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 1-24. DOI: 10.14214/sf.10134
23. Sklyarov G.A., Sharova A.S. Pochvy lesov Evropejskogo Severa [Forest soils of the European North]. M.: Nauka Publ., 1970. 269 p. (In Russ.)
24. Syunyov V., Sokolov A., Konovalov A., Katarov V., Seliverstov A., Gerasimov Yu., Karvinen S., Vyal'kkyu E. Sravnenie tekhnologij lesosechnyh rabot v lesozagotovitel'nyh kompaniyah Respubliki Kareliya [Comparison of wood harvesting methods in the Republic of Karelia]. Joensuu: NII Lesa Finlyandii, 2008. 126 p. (In Russ.)
25. Vadbol'skaya Yu.E., Azarenok V.A. Snizhenie vozdejstviya lesnyh mashin na pochvu pri rubkah uhoda [The reducing negative impacts of forest machinery on soils thinnings]. Lesa Rossii i hozyajstvo v nih, 2015, no. 3 (54), pp. 36-40. (In Russ.)
26. Zaikin A.N., Nikitin V.V., Shcherbakov E.N., Mukovnina M.V. Metodika snizheniya ob''emov tekhnogennogo vozdeystviya lesosechnykh mashin na lesnye ekosistemy na osnove matematicheskogo modelirovaniya rezhimov ikh raboty [Method of decrease of forest machinery technogenic impact on forest ecosystems based on operating modes simulating]. Lesnoy vestnik / Forestry Bulletin, 2018, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 54-61. DOI: 10.18698/2542-1468-2018-5-54-61. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Ilintsev A.S., Nakvasina E.N. Effects of felling residues reinforcement of the strip roads on soil damage after logging operations in the northern taiga subzone. Izvestia Sankt-Peterburgskoj lesotehniceskoj akademii. 2024;(249):22-37. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21266/2079-4304.2024.249.22-37