Preview

Izvestia Sankt-Peterburgskoj lesotehniceskoj akademii

Advanced search

Influence of the ratio of land in agroforest landscapes on the productivity of agricultural crops

https://doi.org/10.21266/2079-4304.2024.250.200-211

Abstract

Lack of moisture and high temperature lead to a decrease in crop yields. According to a number of researchers, the solution to this problem is implemented in an integrated approach, an important link of which is agroforestry. To study the effect of the ratio of agricultural land in the Krasnodar Territory on soil fertility in agroforestry landscapes, we conducted research in 2022. The research was conducted according to generally accepted methods. The condition of the lands of the agricultural landscapes of the districts was assessed according to literary sources and statistical data. The allocation of fertility zones was carried out according to the normalized vegetation index NDVI. The purpose of the research is to study the influence of the ratio of land in agroforestry landscapes on the productivity of crops in the Krasnodar Territory using the Agronomist Online program based on the Sky Scout service. As a result of the research, it was found that a higher percentage of the fertile zone category for all agroforestry areas belongs to the middle category and accounts for 46.09% of the total arable land area of the region. In the second agroforestry district of the Krasnodar Territory (Seversky district), there is a higher percentage of land with a high level of fertile land of 29.63%. In this area, there is also a higher percentage of arable land cover – 3.12. The analysis of the fertility of agroforestry landscapes revealed a linear dependence on all research options. A closer relationship between the yield of winter wheat (2010–2022) and the protective forest cover of arable land is noted for the Seversky district, the regression equation for which has the form y = 1.6622 x – 3307.9 with R2 = 0.5745. Thus, it follows from the presented research results that in order to increase productivity (fertility) in the Krasnodar Territory, it is necessary to additionally create protective forest plantations. The choice of the land ratio should be carried out using an adaptive landscape approach. This approach will contribute to obtaining additional agricultural products, as well as the formation of optimal forest cover, conservation, and improvement of the ecology of agricultural lands in the agro-industrial complex of the region.

About the Author

N. V. Primakov
Kuban State University; Kuban State Agrarian University named after I.T. Trubilin
Russian Federation

Primakov Nikolay V. – PhD (Agricultural), Associate Professor

WOS Researcher ID ABD-8930-2021

350040. Stavropol str. 149. Krasnodar; 350044. Kalinina str. 13. Krasnodar



References

1. Abbas F., Rizwan M., Ehsan S., Hama H.M., Bakhat H.F., Fahad S., Cerdà A., Farhad W. Agroforestry: a sustainable environmental practice for carbon sequestration under the climate change scenarios-a review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2017, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 11177–11191.

2. Bachmair S., Kohn I., Stahl K. Exploring the link between drought indicators and impacts. Natural hazards and earth system Sciences, 2015, vol. 15, рр. 1381–1397.

3. Belyaev A.I., Kulik K.N. Agroforestry is the basis of environmentally safe and economically efficient agriculture. Scientific and Agronomic journal, 2022, no. 2(117), pp. 7–10. (In Russ.)

4. Cano N.M., Nyangito M.M., Wasonga O.V., Kironchi G. Agroforestry practices and factors influencing their adoption by communities in the drylands of eastern Kenya. Agroforestry Systems, 2022, vol. 96, no. 8, pp. 1225–1235.

5. Cheplyansky I.Ya., Turchin T.Ya., Ermolova A.S. Remote monitoring of state protective forest strips of the steppe zone of the European part of Russia. IVUZ. Lesnoj zhurnal, 2022, no. 3, pp. 44–59. URL: https://doi.org/10.37482/0536-1036-2022-3-44-59. (In Russ.)

6. Climate Change 2021. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, Switzerland. 2021, p. 32. URL: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_SPM_final.pdf

7. Erusalimskii V.I., Rozhkov V.A. The Multifunctional Role оf Protective Forest Plantations. Dokuchaev Soil Bulletin, 2017, iss. 88, pp. 121–137. URL: https://doi.org/10.19047/0136-1694-2017-88-121-137. (In Russ.)

8. Hombegowda H.C., Köhler M., Röll A., Hölscher D. Tree species and size influence soil water partitioning in coffee agroforestry. Agroforestry Systems, 2020, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 137–149.

9. Kulik A.V., Voronina V.P., Mozolin A.I. The experience of forming an agroforestry system on the right bank of the Middle Don in order to increase the productivity of agroecosystems. Proceedings of the Nizhnevolzhsky agrouniversitetskiy complex: Science and higher professional education, 2019, no. 3 (55), pp. 142–152. DOI: 10.32786/2071-9485-2019-03-18. (In Russ.)

10. Naumenko V.P., Naumenko E.G., Primakov N.V. Fundamentals of forest soil science: textbook. manual for universities. Novocherkassk: NGMA, 2005. 233 p. (In Russ.)

11. Panov V.I. Optimization of the ratio of the main landscape lands (clusters) in the basin agroecolandscape of the steppe arid belt of Russia. Scientific and Agronomic Journal, 2021, no. 2(113), pp. 6–17. DOI: 10.34736/FNC.2021.113.2.001.6-17. (In Russ.)

12. Pavlovsky E.S. Ecological Role of Protective Forest Plantations in Forest Agrarian Landscapes. Proceedings of the Conference on the Main Issues of the Theory and Practice of Agroforestry. Volgograd, 1982, p. 58. (In Russ.)

13. Pillow K., Liu A., Kinda C., Njagi T. Factors affecting adaptation to climate change through agroforestry in Kenya. Land, 2021, vol. 10, no. 4.

14. Primakov N.V. Condition of the Slope Land Forest Phytocenosis in Krasnodar Krai. IVUZ. Lesnoy Zhurnal, 2019, no. 3, pp. 55–63. DOI: 10.17238/issn0536-1036.2019.3.55. (In Russ.)

15. Primakov N.V. Soil-forming effect of forest plantations of the steppe zone. Monograph. Rostov-on-Don: Publishing House of the Southern Federal University of Rostov-on-Don, 2007. 171 p. (In Russ.)

16. Primakov N.V. Variability of Silvicultural Characteristics of Forest Shelterbelts in Krasnodar Krai. IVUZ. Lesnoy Zhurnal, 2021, no. 1, pp. 60–68. DOI: 10.37482/0536-1036-2021-1-60-68. (In Russ.)

17. Rulev A.S., Pugacheva A.M. Formation of a new agroforestry paradigm. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2019, vol. 89, no. 5, pp. 495–501.

18. Shipilova E.V. The role of protective afforestation in ensuring food and environmental safety. Topical issues of land use and real estate management: collection of articles of the IV National Scientific and Practical Conference. Editor-inchief E.A. Akulova. Yekaterinburg, 2022, pp. 229–234. (In Russ.)

19. Siminski A., Dos santos K.L., Wendt Ju.G.N. Rescuing agroforestry as strategy for agriculture in southern Brazil. Journal of Forestry Research, 2016, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 739–746.

20. Singh V., Raj A., Jhariya M.K., Thakur Sh. Economic evaluation of agroforestry and non-agroforestry systems in eastern Uttar Pradesh, India. Vegetos, 2022, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 810–815.


Review

For citations:


Primakov N.V. Influence of the ratio of land in agroforest landscapes on the productivity of agricultural crops. Izvestia Sankt-Peterburgskoj lesotehniceskoj akademii. 2024;(250):200-211. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21266/2079-4304.2024.250.200-211

Views: 65


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2079-4304 (Print)
ISSN 2658-5871 (Online)