Preview

Izvestia Sankt-Peterburgskoj lesotehniceskoj akademii

Advanced search

Specific aspects of resin production in pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) stands of different stand composition and commodity structure in the blueberry forest type

https://doi.org/10.21266/2079-4304.2025.252.170-187

Abstract

The relevance of research on this issue today is of particular importance, because in connection with the current situation the issue of import substitution of products of harvesting and processing of oleoresin is quite acute. Oleoresin extraction is based, as a rule, on the exploitation of pine stands, and during its realization the trees with increased ability to produce oleoresin mass are of great interest. According to the current rules of oleoresin harvesting in the Russian Federation, the following forest stands can be transferred for exploitation: forest stands with the share of pine in the stand composition of not less than 40% of the total wood stock of the forest stand. In connection with the above-mentioned, the purpose of this study was to determine the resin productivity of pine in stands with different shares of pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Experimental objects for the study were mature stands of pine with the share of its participation from 50 to 100% on permanent sample plots in the Leningrad region. To determine the resin productivity of pine trees, the micro-wounding method was used followed by flow measurement after 10 hours. The study showed that the influence of stand composition on pine resin productivity is not unambiguous. In some cases, no clear differences were found between pine-dominated stands and stands with a lower proportion of pine. Probably, the influence of quantitative representation of trees by size categories is a more significant factor in resin productivity in stands with a different proportion of pine. In general, there is a tendency for greater oleoresin extraction as the proportion of pine in the stand increases with increasing trunk diameter class. For the permanent sample plots, in pure pine stands, no differences in oleoresin extraction were found between the control section and the section with integrated management. However, a significant difference was observed between the other variants, which is related, as well as in mixed pine stands, to the different proportion of tree representation by size stages.

About the Authors

S. N. Shtrakhov
Forestry Department for the NorthWest Federal District
Russian Federation

SHTRAKHOV Sergey N. – Head of the Forestry Department for the NorthWest Federal District 

194021. Institutskiy pr. 21. St. Petersburg 



D. A. Danilov
St.Petersburg State Forest Technical University
Russian Federation

DANILOV Dmitriy A. – DSc (Agriculture), Head of Soil Science Department 

194021. Institutsky per. 5. St. Petersburg 



D. A. Zaytsev
Leningrad Research Agriculture Institute Branch of Russian Potato Research Centre
Russian Federation

ZAYTSEV Dmitriy A. – PhD (Agriculture), Senior Researcher of Department of Agrochemistry and Agrolandscapes 

188338. Institutskaya str. 1. Belogorka. Leningrad Region 



References

1. Analysis of rosin market in Russia 2022. Indicators and forecasts. URL: https://marketing.rbc.ru/research/35646 (assessed: 15.07.2024). (In Russ.)

2. Begunkov O.I., Begunkova N.O. Efficiency of lifetime utilization of wood resources. International Research Journal, 2023, no. 10 (136), pp. 1–4. (In Russ.)

3. Belyaeva N.V., Danilov D.A. Regularities of functioning of soybean and spruce phytocenoses on the objects of thinning and integrated forest care: a monograph. St. Petersburg: Polytechnic University Publishing House, 2014. 164 p. (In Russ.)

4. Bondarenko A.S., Zhigunov A.V. Statistical data processing in forestry: textbook. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State Forestry University Publishing House, 2016. 124 p. (In Russ.)

5. Filippov G.V., Pirogov N.A. Growth progress of stands not affected by economic impact. Proceedings of the St. Petersburg Research Institute of Agriculture, 2001, vol. 1(5). 32 p. (In Russ.)

6. Frolov Y.A., Shtrakhov S.N. Basic indices of resin productivity of pine plantations for calculation of norms. IVUZ. Forestry Journal, 2009, no. 3, pp. 129-131. (In Russ.)

7. Gorkin A.I. On the possibility of processing pine oleoresin at the places of its harvesting. IVUZ. Forestry Journal, 2019, no. 1 (367), pp. 96–105. (In Russ.)

8. Gorkin A.I., Ikonnikova O.V., Petrik V.V. Methods for determining the productivity of pine plantations based on oleoresin yields. Actual problems of forest complex development: materials of the international sci.-tech. conf. Vologda, 2017, pp. 11–13. (In Russ.)

9. Klyuev A.Y., Prokopchuk N.R. Deep complex processing of pine oleoresin (Pinus silvestris L.). Proceedings of BSTU. Series 2: Chemical Technologies, Biotechnology, Geoecology, 2017, no. 1(193), pp. 41–53. (In Russ.)

10. Novoselov A.S., Fedyaev A.L., Petrik V.V. Influence of ecological conditions on terpentine production in drained pine forests of the Vologda Oblast. Russian Forestry Journal, 2014, no. 2 (338), pp. 40–45. (In Russ.)

11. Pastukhova N.O. Criteria of resin productivity of pine stands:author’s abstract. Dis. … Candidate of Agricultural Sciences. Arkhangelsk: NAFU, 2017. 19 p. (In Russ.)

12. Pastukhova N.O., Antonov A.M. Forest taxation indications of resin productivity of pine forests and the project of measures to increase the yield of oleoresin. International Student Scientific Bulletin, 2014, no. 3. URL: https://eduherald.ru/ru/article/view?id=11891 (accessed July 15, 2024). (In Russ.)

13. Pastukhova N.O., Petrik V.V., Nakvasina E.N., Gorkin A.I. Relation of morphological features to the resin-productive capacity of the common pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in hydromorphic and automorphic forest types. The Bulletin of KrasGAU, 2014, no. 8 (95), pp. 151–155. (In Russ.)

14. Pastukhova N.O., Gorkin A.I., Lebedeva O.P. Comparative analysis of pine resin productivity in different forest conditions. IVUZ. Forestry Journal, 2018, no. 2 (362), pp. 49–57. (In Russ.)

15. Petrik V.V. Forestry methods of intensification of pine stands under resin harvesting. IVUZ. Forestry Journal, 2002, no. 3, pp. 38–44. (In Russ.)

16. Petrik V.V. Forestry methods of increasing resin productivity of pine stands. Arkhangelsk: Arkhangelsk State Technical University Publishing House, 2004. 236 p. (In Russ.)

17. Petrik V.V., Yarunov A.S. Accuracy of accelerated methods for determining the resin productivity of pine trees. IVUZ. Forestry Journal, 1997, no. 5, pp. 125–130. (In Russ.)

18. Project of forestry organization and management in Siversky les Experimental Forestry of St. Petersburg Research Institute of Agriculture: explanatory note. St. Petersburg, 2001. 201 p. (In Russ.)

19. Sennov S.N. Forest care (Environmental Basics). Mocsow: Forest industry, 1984. 128 p. (In Russ.)

20. Sennov S.N. Results of long-term experiments with forest maintenance cuttings. Forestry Journal, 2001, no. 2, pp. 28–29. (In Russ.)

21. Yarunov A.S., Petrik V.V. Prospects of resin production and research in the field of resin harvestiong. IVUZ. Forestry Journal, 2002, no. 5, pp. 30–35. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Shtrakhov S.N., Danilov D.A., Zaytsev D.A. Specific aspects of resin production in pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) stands of different stand composition and commodity structure in the blueberry forest type. Izvestia Sankt-Peterburgskoj lesotehniceskoj akademii. 2025;(252):170-187. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21266/2079-4304.2025.252.170-187

Views: 33


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2079-4304 (Print)
ISSN 2658-5871 (Online)