Study of geographical variability in two generations of spruce culture in the Leningrad region
https://doi.org/10.21266/2079-4304.2025.255.118-141
Abstract
The study of two generations of spruce provenance trials established in the Leningrad Region allows us to trace the geographical variability of the species Picea abies (L.) Karst. and Picea obovata Ledeb. The first-generation culture object was created within the framework of the VNIILM program in 1977 on the territory of the Lyuban forestry, where cones were harvested to create second-generation provenance trials. The second generation is represented by semi-sib progenies on three objects that were established in 2006–2015 in the Gatchina and Kirov forestries and in the Lisinsky educational and experimental forestry (UOL). In the cultures of two generations, successful development of the offspring of Picea abies and a slow growth rate of P. obovata were established. The positive influence of the state of maternal climatypes on the preservation and growth of progenies was noted: the procurement of cones in plantations with a high bonitet class contributes to a more successful growth of progeny in both the first and second generations. Southern and western offspring with greater heat and moisture supply in the areas of original origins grow more intensively than northern and eastern ones, with less heat and moisture. The share of the influence of the maternal genotype in growth indicators reaches 56%. A direct relationship between the cone yield in mother plantations and the growth of daughter progenies was revealed. In 45-year-old crops, the most highly productive are the local Leningrad progeny and the progeny from the Pudozh forestry of the Republic of Karelia (550–580 m3/ha). In the second-generation objects, the highest selection significance is possessed by the climatype progeny from the Velikiye Luki forestry of the Pskov Region. Deliveries of spruce seeds to the Leningrad forest seed sub-district are possible from the Pskov, Tver, Moscow (north, northwest), Kaluga (center, north), Vitebsk (north, northeast) regions and the southern part of the Republic of Karelia, with coordinates limited to approximately 54°20′ – 61°40′ N and 27° – 39°E.
Keywords
About the Authors
M. A. NikolaevaRussian Federation
NikolaevA Marina A. – PhD (Agriculture), Head of the Laboratory of Department of Botany and Dendrology, St.Petersburg State Forest Technical University; Senior Research Engineer of Project Center of Agro Technologies of Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technologies (Skoltech)
194021, Institute per. 5. St. Petersburg,
121205, Bolshoy boul. 30. Build. 1. Moscow
M. Ye. Guzyuk
Russian Federation
Guzyuk Marianna Ye. – PhD (Agriculture), Associate Professor of the Department of Forest Cultures
194021, Institute per. 5. St. Petersburg
N. I. Baranov
Russian Federation
Baranov Nikita I. – PhD student of the Forest Cultures Department
194021, Institute per. 5. St. Petersburg
A. V. Zhigunov
Russian Federation
Zhigunov Anatoliy V. – DSc (Agriculture), Professor, Head of the Department of Forest Cultures, St.Petersburg State Forest Technical University; Researcher of Project Center of Agro Technologies of Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technologies (Skoltech)
194021, Institute per. 5. St. Petersburg,
Bolshoy boul. 30. Build. 1. Moscow
121205, ResearcherID: AAK-8124-2020
References
1. Bagaev S.S. The study of geographical variabiliy of spruce provenance trials in Kostroma region. Forestry information, 2014, no. 4, pp. 40–53. (In Russ.)
2. Bondarenko A.S., Zhigunov A.V. Statistical processing of forestry research materials: manual. St. Petersburg: Polytech. University, 2016. 125 p. (In Russ.)
3. Filippova L.N., Uvarova N.I. Results of testing pine and spruce of different geographical origins in the North-West of the RSFSR. Development of genetics and selection in forestry production. М., 1988, pp. 60–61. (In Russ.)
4. Forest seed zoning of the main forest-forming species in the USSR. Moscow: Lesnaya promyshlennost, 1982. 368 p. (In Russ.)
5. Giertych M. Summary results of the IUFRO 1938 Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) provenance experiment. Height growth. Silvae Genetica, 1976, vol. 25 (5-6), pp. 154–164.
6. Latsevich A.V. Study of macroscopic features and wood density of the second generation of Scots pine climaecotypes. Forests of Eurasia – White Nights: proceedings of the III Int. conf. of young scientists. Moscow, 2003, pp. 105–107. (In Russ.)
7. Mamaev S.A. Patterns of intraspecific variability of the family Pinaceae in the Urals: Diss. … Doct. Biol. Sci. Sverdlovsk: Institute of Ecology of Plants and Animals UF АN SSSR, 1970. 54 p. (In Russ.)
8. Marisaya G.K., Uvarova N.I., Filippova L.N. Results of geographical testing of pine, spruce, larch in the North-West of the RSFSR. Selection, genetics and seed production of tree species as a basis for creating highly productive forests: abstracts of reports and communications at the All-Union sci.-tech. conf. Moscow, 1980, part I, pp. 246–249. (In Russ.)
9. Matveeva R.N., Butorova O.F., Shcherba Yu.E., Komarnitskiy V.V., Ivanov V.S., Grishilov D.A. Influence of geographical origin on the growth of second-generation siberian stone pine. Conifers of the boreal area zone, 2019, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 426–431. (In Russ.)
10. Merzlenko M.D., Mel’nik P.G. The result of thirty vegetations in provenance trials of the spruce of the Sergiev Posad experimental forestry. Scientific works of Moscow State Forestry University, 1995, vol. 274, pp. 64–77. (In Russ.)
11. Morozova E.V., Iozus A.P. Features of adaptation processes of Scots pine provenance trials of second-generation in the dry steppe conditions of the Lower Volga region. Fundamental research, 2015, no. 7 (part 2), pp. 260–262. (In Russ.)
12. Mozolevskaya E.G., Kataev O.A., Sokolova Eh.S. Methods of forest pathological survey of locus of stem pests and forest diseases. Moscow: Forest Industrial, 1984. 152 p. (In Russ.)
13. Nakvasina Е.N. Testing intergeographical progenies of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in the Komi Republic. IVUZ. Forestry Journal, 2014, no. 5, pp. 17–24. (In Russ.)
14. Nakvasina Е.N., Barabin А.I. Growth of half-sib intergeographical hybrids of Scots pine in test crops of the northern taiga subzone of the Arkhangelsk region. IVUZ. Forestry Journal, 2009, no. 5, pp. 25–30. (In Russ.)
15. Nikolaeva M.A. The growth and reproductive features of spruce in provenance trials of the Leningrad region: Diss. … Cand. Agric. Sci. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg forestry research institute, 2005. 176 p. (In Russ.)
16. Nikolaeva M.A., Pelevina N.N. Comparative assessment of spruce climatypes in provenance trials of the Leningrad region. St. Petersburg forestry research institute proceedings, 2000, vol. 2 (3), pp. 119–128. (In Russ.)
17. Nikolaeva M.A., Guzyuk M.Ye. Health, productivity and seed-bearing characteristics of spruce in provenance trials of the Leningrad region. St. Petersburg forestry research institute proceedings, 2009, vol. 1 (18), pp. 105–122. (In Russ.)
18. Nikolaeva M.A., Yamaleev O.A., Anufrieva E.S. Features of adaptation of coniferous species in provenance trials of the North-West forest seed region. Forest news, 2010, no. 3 (4), pp. 97–105. (In Russ.)
19. Nikolaeva M.A., Zhigunov А.В. Phenological and reproductive features of spruce in geographical plantations of the Leningrad region. Lesovedenie, 2012, no. 2, pp. 35–46. (In Russ.)
20. Nikolaeva М.А., Varentsova E.Yu. Phytopatological status and preservation of spruce in provenance trials of the Lyubansky Forest District of Leningrad Region. Izvestia Sankt-Peterburgskoj Lesotehniceskoj Akademii, 2019, iss. 228, pp. 216–233. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.21266/2079-4304.2019.228.216-233.
21. Nikolaeva M.A., Zhigunov А.В., Guzyuk M.Ye., Guzyuk A.S. Testing of climatypes of the main forest-forming species as a basis for forest seed zoning in Russia. Forests of Russia: policy, industry, science, education: proceedings of IV sci.-tech. conf. St. Petersburg, 2019, pp. 148–151. (In Russ.)
22. Norway spruce in the Conservation of Forest Ecosistems in Europe. The results of the IUFRO experimental tests series: 1938/39, 1964/68, 1972 and others: proceeding of conf. Kraków – Wisła, Beskid Montains, 2012. 110 p.
23. Orlov M.M. Forest auxiliary book for taxation and technical calculation. 8th revision ed. Moscow-Leningrad: Gos. izd. sel./khoz. i kolhozno-koop. lit., 1931. 736 p. (In Russ.)
24. Park Y.S., Gerhold H.D. Population hybridization in Scotch pine (Pinus sylvestris L.): I. Genetic variance components and heterosis. Silvae Genetica, 1986, vol. 35 (4), pp. 159–165.
25. Patlay I.P. The growth and sustainability of Scots pine in second-generation provenance trials in Trostyanets forestry plantation of Sumy region. Lesnoy zhurnal, 1974, no. 6, pp. 155–160. (In Russ.)
26. Poplavskaya L.F., Rebko S.V., Tupik P.V. The use of ecological-geographical method of selection of parental pairs in breeding of scots pine. Conservation of Forest Genetic Resources: proceedings of the 5th Int. conf. Gomel, 2017, pp. 189–191. (In Russ.)
27. Raevsky B.V., Ignatenko R.V., Novichonok E.V., Prokopiuk V.M., Kuklina K.K. The current state of coniferous species breeding and seed production. IVUZ. Forestry Journal, 2022, no. 6, pp. 9–37. DOI: 10.37482/0536-1036-2022-6-9-37. (In Russ.)
28. Shutyaev A.M. The variability of coniferous species in the test plantations of the Central Black Earth Region. Moscow, 2007. 296 p. (In Russ.)
29. Shutyaev A.M. What is forest seed production in the ХХI century (book-survey). Voronezh: Istoki, 2011. 248 p. (In Russ.)
30. The study of available and creation of new provenance trials: program and methods of work. Pushkino: VNIILM, 1972. 52 p. (In Russ.)
31. Tarkhanov S.N. Variability of spruce in provenance trials of Republic Komi. 1998. Ekaterinburg: UrO RAS, 1998. 195 p. (In Russ.)
32. Uvarova N.I. Using the geographical variability of coniferous in the North-West of the RSFSR: guidelines. Leningrad: LenNIILH, 1983. 22 p. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Nikolaeva M.A., Guzyuk M.Ye., Baranov N.I., Zhigunov A.V. Study of geographical variability in two generations of spruce culture in the Leningrad region. Izvestia Sankt-Peterburgskoj lesotehniceskoj akademii. 2025;(255):118-141. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21266/2079-4304.2025.255.118-141











