Development of molecular genetic markers of genes encoding adaptive response methods in pine
https://doi.org/10.21266/2079-4304.2026.257.238-254
Abstract
Under the conditions of global climate change, which leads to increased frequency of droughts, frosts, and pest outbreaks, the breeding of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) for enhanced resilience is an urgent task. Marker-assisted selection (MAS) is a promising tool for accelerating the breeding process, requiring the development of molecular markers associated with adaptive traits. The aim of this study was to develop and preliminarily test such markers. Due to the lack of a whole-genome reference assembly for Scots pine, a candidate-gene approach was employed. The study focused on genes whose homologs in related species are associated with adaptation: PRR1 and PRR7 (components of the circadian clock involved in response to photoperiod and temperature stress), dhn1 (a dehydrin conferring resistance to dehydration), as well as the mitochondrial genes COX1 and ATP-A (phylogenetic markers). Based on polymorphisms (SNPs and a deletion) identified by sequencing, 4 KASP and 1 STS markers were developed. Their testing was conducted on geographical cultures of pine using a sample of 100 trees from four climotypes (Leningrad Region, Karelia, Estonia, Udmurtia). Statistical analysis using Fisher's exact test revealed a significant difference (p ≤ 0.05) in allele frequencies of the PRR7 gene between the Karelian and Udmurtian climotypes, indicating a potential longitudinal cline for this locus and its potential informativeness for assessing adaptive population differentiation. For the other genes, no clear associations were established within this sample. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the candidate-gene approach for the initial stage of developing molecular markers for adaptation in Scots pine and lay the groundwork for further research to establish reliable phenotype-genotype linkages with the aim of subsequent application in breeding programs to create resilient planting material.
About the Authors
E. D. SafronychevaRussian Federation
Safronycheva Elizaveta D. – Junior Researcher at the Centre for Bioinformatics and Genomic Research; Junior Researcher
194021. Institute per. 5. Let. U. St. Petersburg
194021. Institute per. 21. St. Petersburg
M. A. Grigoryev
Russian Federation
Grigoryev Matvey A. – Laboratory Research Assistant at the Scientific Research Department of Genetics and Biotechnology; student
194021. Institute per. 21. St. Petersburg
194021. Institute per. 5. Let. U. St. Petersburg
D. S. Karzhaev
Russian Federation
Karzhaev Dmitry S. – Junior Researcher at the Center for Bioinformatics and Genomic Research ; Researcher at the Scientific Research Department of Genetics and Biotechnology
194024. Institute per. 5. St. Petersburg
194021. Institute per. 21. St. Petersburg
V. V. Sharshavikova
Russian Federation
Sharshavikova Veronika V. – Laboratory Research Assistant at the Scientific Research Department of Genetics and Biotechnology
194021. Institute per. 21. St. Petersburg
M. V. Tis
Russian Federation
Tis Margarita V. – Junior Researcher at the Center for Bioinformatics and Genomic Research; Junior Researcher at the Scientific Research Department of Genetics and Biotechnology; PhD student; Junior Research Engineer at the Project Center for Agro Technologies
194024. Institute per. 5. St. Petersburg
194021. Institute per. 21. St. Petersburg
197101. Kronverkskiy av. 49. Let. A. St. Petersburg
121205. Bolshoy boul. 30. Bld. 1. Moscow
N. A. Pavlov
Russian Federation
Pavlov Nikita A. – Research intern at the Center for Bio- and Medical Technologies; Skoltech master's
121205. Bolshoy boul. 30. Bld. 1. Moscow
V. A. Volkov
Russian Federation
Volkov Vladimir A. – PhD (Biological), Director of the Center for Bioinformatics and Genomic Research; Researcher at the Scientific Research Department of Genetics and Biotechnology
194024. Institute per. 5. St. Petersburg
194021. Institute per. 21. St. Petersburg
References
1. Butcher P., Southerton S. Marker Assisted Selection in Forestry Species. Marker Assisted Selection: Current Status and Future Perspectives in Crop, Livestock, Forestry and Fish. Rome, 2007, ch. 15, pp. 284-305.
2. Caré O., Chano V., Erley M., Rogge M., Gailing O. Circadian rhythm and redox homeostasis candidate genes showed association with shallow elevation in Norway spruce. Plant Biology, 2024, vol. 26, iss. 4, pp. 508-520. DOI: 10.1111/plb.13642.
3. Feng J., Dan X., Cui Y., Gong Y., Peng M., Sang Y., Ingvarsson P.K., Wang J. Integrating evolutionary genomics of forest trees to inform future tree breeding amid rapid climate change. Plant Communications, 2024, vol. 5, iss. 10, art. no. 101044. DOI: 10.1016/j.xplc.2024.101044.
4. Forest Genetic Resources of Russia: Study, Conservation, Use, Management: a collective monograph in 2 books. Pushkino: All-Russian Research Institute of Forestry and Mechanization of Forestry, 2024. 546 p. (In Russ.)
5. Hotta C.T. The evolution and function of the PSEUDO RESPONSE REGULATOR gene family in the plant circadian clock. Genetics and Molecular Biology, 2022, vol. 45, iss. 3 Suppl 1, art. no. e20220137. DOI: 10.1590/1678-4685-gmb-2022-0137.
6. Ito S., Niwa Y., Nakamichi N., Kawamura H., Yamashino T., Mizuno T. Insight into missing genetic links between two evening-expressed pseudo-response regulator genes TOC1 and PRR5 in the circadian clock-controlled circuitry in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant and cell physiology, 2008, vol. 49, iss. 2, pp. 201–213. DOI: 10.1093/pcp/pcm178.
7. Kaczorowski K.A., Quail P.H. Arabidopsis PSEUDO-RESPONSE REGULATOR7 is a signaling intermediate in phytochrome-regulated seedling deetiolation and phasing of the circadian clock. The Plant Cell, 2003, vol. 15, iss. 11, pp. 2654–2665. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.015065.
8. Kim Y.J., Kim W.Y., Somers D.E. HOS 15‐mediated turnover of PRR 7 enhances freezing tolerance. New Phytologist, 2024, vol. 244, iss. 3, pp. 798–810. DOI: 10.1111/nph.20062.
9. Korotaeva N., Romanenko A., Suvorova G., Ivanova M.I., Lomovatskaya L., Borovskii G., Voinikov V. Seasonal changes in the content of dehydrins in mesophyll cells of common pine needles. Photosynthesis Research, 2015, vol. 124, pp. 159–169. DOI: 10.1007/s11120-015-0112-2.
10. Leites L., Benito Garzón M. Forest tree species adaptation to climate across biomes: Building on the legacy of ecological genetics to anticipate responses to climate change. Global Change Biology, 2023, vol. 29, iss. 17, pp. 4711–4730. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.16711.
11. Lundqvist L., Ahlström M.A., Axelsson E.P., Mörling T., Valinger E. Multilayered Scots pine forests in boreal Sweden result from mass regeneration and size stratification. Forest Ecology and Management, 2019, vol. 441, pp. 176–181. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.03.044.
12. Millar C.I., Stephenson N.L. Temperate forest health in an era of emerging megadisturbance. Science, 2015, vol. 349, iss. 6250, pp. 823–826. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaa9933.
13. Muranty H., Jorge V., Bastien C., Lepoittevin C., Bouffier L., Sanchez L. Potential for marker-assisted selection for forest tree breeding: lessons from 20 years of MAS in crops. Tree Genetics & Genomes, 2014, vol. 10, iss. 6, pp. 1491-1510. DOI: 10.1007/s11295-014-0790-5.
14. Rahimah A.B., Cheah S.C., Rajinder S. Freeze-drying of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) leaf and its effect on the quality of extractable DNA. Journal of Oil Palm Research, 2006, vol. 18, pp. 296–304.
15. Seidl R., Thom D., Kautz M., Martin-Benito D., Peltoniemi M., Vacchiano G., Wild J., Ascoli D., Petr M., Honkaniemi J., Lexer M.J., Trotsiuk V., Mairota P., Svoboda M., Fabrika M., Nagel T.A., Reyer C.P.O. Forest disturbances under climate change. Nature climate change, 2017, vol. 7, iss. 6, pp. 395-402. DOI: 10.1038/nclimate3303.
16. Semerikov V.L., Putinseva Yu.A., Oreshkova N.V., Semerikova S.A., Krutovskiy K.V. Development of New Mitochondrial DNA Markers for Scots Pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) for Population-Genetic and Phylogeographic Studies Genetika, 2015, vol. 51, no. 12, pp. 1386-1390. DOI 10.7868/S0016675815120103. (In Russ.)
17. Stival Sena J., Giguère I., Rigault P., Bousquet J., Mackay J. Expansion of the dehydrin gene family in the Pinaceae is associated with considerable structural diversity and drought-responsive expression. Tree Physiology, 2018, vol. 38, iss. 3, pp. 442-456. DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpx125.
18. Volkov V.A., Karzhayev D.S., Safronycheva E.D., Tis M.V., Chukhlantseva K.V., Sharshavikova V.V., Potokina E.K. Use of KASP and HRM Markers for Detection of Polymorphisms Affecting Adaptive Traits of Pine and Spruce. Izvestiya SanktPeterburgskoy Lesotekhnicheskoy Akademii, 2024, iss. 251, pp. 229-244. DOI: 10.21266/2079-4304.2024.251.229-244. (In Russ.)
19. Wachowiak W., Balk P.A., Savolainen O. Search for nucleotide diversity patterns of local adaptation in dehydrins and other cold-related candidate genes in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Tree Genetics & Genomes, 2009, vol. 5, iss. 1, pp. 117-132. DOI: 10.1007/s11295-008-0188-3.
20. van Zee K., Chen F.Q., Hayes P.M., Close T.J., Chen T.H.H. Cold-specific induction of a dehydrin gene family member in barley. Plant Physiology, 1995, vol. 108, iss. 3, pp. 1233-1239. DOI: 10.1104/pp.108.3.1233.
Review
For citations:
Safronycheva E.D., Grigoryev M.A., Karzhaev D.S., Sharshavikova V.V., Tis M.V., Pavlov N.A., Volkov V.A. Development of molecular genetic markers of genes encoding adaptive response methods in pine. Izvestia Sankt-Peterburgskoj lesotehniceskoj akademii. 2026;1(257):238-254. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21266/2079-4304.2026.257.238-254
JATS XML





