Current practices for the management of SPNA on forest fund land

The research was carried out as part of the collection of information and description of promising methods for assessing the conditions and management of landscapes by of natural protected territories, for lands of the forest fund of the Republic of Crimea. This article contains current methods, mechanisms and practices of forest landscapes management used in foreign forests. In honor, they are practiced in central Spain, in northern Pakistan, in the south-eastern United States, in Sri-Lanka, in Romanian beech forests and in 13 European regions. The goal is the analysis of naive practices of the management of protected areas in regions with geoclimatic features designed to draw an analogy with the conditions in the Crimea. The object of the study is the sphere of landscape management of protected areas. The subject of the study is the relationship between the formation, structure and development of protected areas landscapes. Materials it is, articles and publications on the topic of inheritance. In order to achieve the set whole investigation, general scientific and specialized approaches and methods are used in the work, based on the results and proposed, formulated in the selection: synthesis, induction, deduction, unevenhistorical, structural-functional approach. In the course of the analysis of the publication of the more of current practitioners of the management of personally protected forests in foreign countries was carried out. This article specifies the methods, mechanisms and practices of forest landscapes management used in foreign forests with landscapes and climatic conditions with Crimea and, as an alternative, are represented by territories that alienate from the Crimea at the same time with methods and techniques that are very promising for the Crimea. When analyzing current forest management practices, information about vegetation, soils, landscapes, the level of endemicity/security, the type of activity, the structure of the Forest was loaded and is also a research method. The analysis was carried out in tabular form and is presented in the sections Results and discussions. Relevant for Crimea will apply a moral division to forest management, following the example of Swedish and Finnish National Parks, in the case of forest management, Les are perceived as inheriting their ancestors and emotionally involved in ensuring that they preserve and save national supplies. These are able traditions and national folklore. With such participation, voluntary protection by citizens and careful attitude to forest resources are realized. In small areas of the Crimea in a flat place, the Fund of oak forests will be relevant, following the example of the Spanish «Dehes» (Dehesa – rarely located oak forests, low completeness oak forests), which will be capable, combining animal husbandry and forestry, as well as ascended soil fertility. The formed conditions in the long term will become an incentive to attract a more and more of rural residents. A rural settlement living in a close forested area, as look like in Pakistan, Gilgit Baltistan district, is more actively involved in used forest resources and sequential and administrative forests. Which is able to increase the area of land covered by the forest. By analogy with Sri-Lanka, let's not bring to the attention of the population in the forest management, increase the interest of the local population in preserving and increasing forest wealth, achieve such a whole mobile education system, as well as frequent positive communication with the community. Similar to beech forests in Romania, in the northern macroscline Chatyrdag mountains in the Crimea, the resulting permutations, old overgrown beechs bearing anti-erosion and stagnant functions, in which similarly used exclusively, care cutting and sanitary logging. Unlike the forest cadastres indicated in the study, information about the condition of trees is very selectively indicated during forest management in the Crimea. In honor, in the forest cadastres of Swedish figurines, the code (definition) is «dead, harvested», and in the forestry inventory, this category of trees is indicated as «deadwood», «deadwood of the current year», «deadwood of the past years», in other forest cadastres, the tracked categories of this category are not publicly displayed. In considering the methods of assessing the state and management of landscapes, the method of remote sensing of the earth using satellite images, permanent electronic 3D models of callers, examine the terrain features, painful detailed reduced require decryption and still not call for updating the sexual picture. At this time, as a unmanned aerial vehicles capable of recording received during the resolution, with the necessary angle.

1. Kalutchcova N.N., Shutova I.U., Dronin N.M. An organization of landscape research in biosphere reserves. In collected papers Russian biosphere reserves at the present stage (Part 1. European territory of the Russian Federation). (Part 1. The European Territory of the Russian Federation). M.: Russian Committee of the IAB, 2007, pp. 73–82.

2. Ali S., Wang D., Hussain T., Lu X., Nurunnabi M. Forest Resource Management: An Empirical Study in Northern Pakistan. Sustainability, 2021, 13, 8752. URL: https:// doi.org/10.3390/su13168752

3. Bouriaud O., Don A., Janssens I. A., Marin G. and Schulze E.-D. Effects of forest management on biomass stocks in Romanian beech. Bouriaud et al. Forest Ecosystems, 2019, 6:19. URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-019-0180-4

4. Bouriaud O., Marin G., Bouriaud L., Hessenmöller D., Schulze E-D. Romanian legal management rules limit wood production in Norway spruce and beech forests. Forest Ecosyst, 2016, 3:20.

5. Bitterlich W. Die Winkelza¨ hlprobe: Ein optisches Meßverfahren zur raschen Aufnahme besonders gearteter Probefla¨ chen fu¨ r die Bestimmung der Kreisfla¨ chen pro Hektar an stehenden Waldbesta¨ nden. Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt, 1952, 71, pp. P. 215–225. URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207151.t001

6. Cano E., Musarella C.M., Cano Ortiz A., Piñar Fuentes J.C., Pinto Gomes C.J., Rodrígez Torres A., Spampinato G. A phytosociological review of siliceous sedges in C-W Spain and their state of conservation based on diversity indices. Plant Sociol., 2017, 54 (Suppl. 1), pp. 5–14.

7. Cano-Ortiz A., Musarella C.M., Piñar Fuentes J.C., Quinto Canas R., Pinto Gomes C.J., Spampinato G., Ighbareyeh J.M.H., del Río S., Cano E. Forest and Arborescent Scrub Habitats of Special Interest for SCIs in Central Spain. Land, 2021, 10, 183. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/land10020183

8. Dasgupta P., Southerton, D., Ulph, A., Ulph, D. Consumer behaviour with environmental and social externalities: Implications for analysis and policy. Environ. Resour. Econ., 2016, 65, pp. 191–226. [CrossRef]

9. Ekanayake E.M.B.P., Xie Y., Ahmad S. Rural Residents’ Participation Intention in Community Forestry-Challenge and Prospect of Community Forestry in Sri Lanka. Forests, 2021, 12, 1050. URL: https:// doi.org/10.3390/f12081050 European Commission.

10. REGULATION (EU) OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of . . .on the inclusion of greenhouse gas emissions and removals from land use, land use change and forestry into the 2030 climate and energy framework and amending Regulation (EU) No 525/2013 and Decision No 529/2013/EU. 2016/0230 (COD). Brussels. 17 December 2017. 60 p.

11. Europe Forest. State of Europe’s forests 2015. Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe, 2015. Liaison Unit Madrid. 2015. 314 p.

12. Piñar Fuentes J.C., Cano Ortiz A., Musarella C.M., Pinto Gomes C.J., Spampinato G., Cano E. Rupicolous habitats of interest for conservation in the centralsouthern Iberian peninsula. Plant Sociol., 2017, 54 (Suppl. 1), pp. 29–42.

13. Piñar Fuentes J.C., Cano Ortiz A., Musarella C.M., Quinto Canas R., Pinto Gomes C.J., Spampinato G., Del Río S., Cano E. Bioclimatology, Structure, and Conservation Perspectives of Quercus pyrenaica, Acer opalus subsp. grantensis, and Corylus avellana Deciduous Forests on Mediterranean Bioclimate in the South-Central Part of the Iberian Península. Sustainbility, 2019, 11, 6500. [CrossRef]

14. Levers C., Verker P.J., Mu¨ ller D., Verburg P.H., Butsic V., Leitão P.J. et al. Drivers of forest harvesting intensity patterns in Europe. For Ecol Manage, 2014, 315, pp. 160–172. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.12.030

15. Meijaard E., Santika T., Wilson K.A., Budiharta S., Kusworo A., Law E.A., Struebig M.J. Toward improved impact evaluation of community forest management in Indonesia. Conserv. Sci. Pract., 2021, 3, pp. 189. [CrossRef]

16. NCASI. Compendium of Forestry Best Management Practices for Controlling Nonpoint Source Pollution in North America; National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc.: Research Triangle Park, NC, USA, 2019.

17. Noormets A., Epron D., Domec J.C., McNulty S.G., Fox T., Sun G., King J.S. Effects of forest management on productivity and carbon sequestration: a review and hypothesis. Forest Ecol Manag, 2015, 355, рр. 124–140.

18. Zain O.F. A Socio-Political Study of Gilgit Baltistan Province. Pak. J. Soc. Sci. (PJSS), 2010, 30, рр. 181–190.

19. Schilling E.B., Larsen-Gray A.L., Miller D.A. Forestry Best Management Practices and Conservation of Aquatic Systems in the Southeastern United States. Water, 2021, 13, 2611. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/w13192611

20. Schulze E.-D., Bouriaud O., Weber U., Roscher C., Hessenmöller D. Management beaks the natural productivity-biodiversity relationship in forests and grassland: an opinion. Forest Ecosyst, 2018a, 5:3.

21. Schelhaas M.-J., Fridman J., Hengeveld G.M., Henttonen H.M, Lehtonen A., Kies U. et al. Actual European forest management by region, tree species and owner based on 714,000 re-measured trees in national forest inventories. PLoS ONE, 2018, 13(11), e0207151. URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207151

22. SGSF. Silvicultural Best Management Practices Implementation Monitoring: A Framework for State Forestry Agencies; Southern Group of State Foresters, Water Resources Committee, 2007. P. 28.

23. Weersink A., Fulton M. Limits to profit maximization as a guide to behavior change. Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy, 2020, 42, рр. 67–79. [CrossRef]