Influence of geographical origin of spruce seeds on the condition and growth of 45-year-old stands in the Leningrad region
https://doi.org/10.21266/2079-4304.2023.246.104-125
Abstract
The results of long-term tests of provenance trials planted under the program of VNIILM in 1977 in Leningrad region with seed progenies of Picea abies (L.) Karst., Picea obovata Ledeb. and hybrid forms of these two species are presented. During the 45-year period of crop development it was found that European spruce and hybrid forms with predominant features of European spruce have significant advantages over Siberian spruce in the test area. This is due to the influence of many factors. First of all, geographical origin of seeds and different degrees of plant adaptability to nonnative growing conditions. The best safety (46–54%), along with local Leningrad, is characterized by progeny of hybrid forms originating from Pryazhinsky leskhoz of the Republic of Karelia and Konoshsky leskhoz of the Arkhangelsk region. Low preservation (18–32%), extremely weakened condition and growth are noted in the progeny of P. obovata and hybrid forms originating from the most distant to the east (Komi, Sverdlovsk) and north (Arkhangelsk-Pinega) regions. For many years a reliable dependence has been traced: the more northern and eastern the location of maternal climatypes, the worse the condition, preservation, growth and productivity of progeny; the share of influence of geographical factors reaches, depending on latitude and longitude of origins, 48 and 64% respectively. Successful development of spruce offspring depends on factors of climate in places of seed production, the period with temperature over +5 °C having the maximal value; the share of its influence on growth of crops is 73–74%. At present, the leader in productivity is local Leningrad progeny. The best descendants of non-native climatic species were identified with origins within the borders: tentatively 61°40′ 54°20′N and 36°20′ 22°E; first of all this applies to origins from the Tver Region, Republic of Karelia (Pryazhinsky leskhoz), Republics of Lithuania and Belarus.
About the Authors
М. А. NikolaevaRussian Federation
NIKOLAEVA Marina A. – PhD (Agriculture), Teacher
194021. Institutsky per. 5. St. Petersburg
A. V. Zhigunov
Russian Federation
ZHIGUNOV Anatolii V. – DSc (Agriculture), Professor
194021. Institutsky per. 5. St. Petersburg
N. I. Baranov
Russian Federation
BARANOV Nikita I. – undergraduate
194021. Institutsky per. 5. St. Petersburg
References
1. Alexandru A.-M., Mihai G., Stoica E., Curtu A.L. Multi-trait selection and stability in Norway spruce (Picea abies) provenance trials in Romania. Forests. 2023. Vol. 14, no. 3, р. 456.
2. Bagaev S.S., Korenev I.A. Geograficheskie kulʼtury eli v Kostromskoj oblasti [Spruce provenance trails in the Kostroma region, Russia]. Problemy vosproizvodstva lesov v Rossijskoj Federatsii [Problems of reforestation in the Russian Federation]: mater. Mezhdunar. nauch.-pract. konf. 4–6 June, 2014. Kazan. Pushkino: VNIILM, 2015, pp. 18–22. (In Russ.)
3. Bondarenko A.S., Zhigunov A.V. Statisticheskaya obrabotka materialov lesovodstvennyh issledovanij [Statistical processing of forestry research materials]. Training manual. SPb.: Polytech. University, 2016. 125 p. (In Russ.)
4. Chmura D.J., Matras J., Barzdajn W., Buraczyk W., Kowalkowski W., Kowalczyk J., Rożkowski R., Szeligowski H. Variation in growth of Norway spruce in the IUFRO 1972 provenance experimental series. Silvae Genetica, 2018, vol. 67, pp. 26–33.
5. Dursin A.D. Geograficheskie kulʼtury eli v Leningradskoj oblasti [Spruce provenance trails in the Leningrad region]: Ph.D. (Agroculture) dissertation. Leningrad: LTA, 1980. 20 p. (In Russ.)
6. Giertych M. Summary results of the IUFRO 1938 Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) provenance experiment. Height growth. Silvae Genetica, 1976, vol. 25, no. 5–6, pp. 154–164.
7. Giertych M. The 1964/68 IUFRO inventory provenance test of Norway spruce. Bałut S., Sabor J. (eds.) Inventory provenance test of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) IPTNS-IUFRO 1964/68 in Krynica. Krakov: AR. 2001, pp. 7–10.
8. Izuchenie imeyushchikhsya i sozdanie novyh geograficheskih kulʼtur: Programma i metodika rabot [The study of available and creation of new provenance trials: Program and metods of work]. Ed. by E.P. Prokazin. Pushkino: VNIILM, 1972. 52 p. (In Russ.)
9. Kovalevich A.I., Veras S.N., Fomin E.A. Osobennosti rosta i razvitiya provenientsij eli evropejskoj v geograficheskih kulʼturah [Features of the growth and development of Norway spruce provenance in provenance trials]. Trudy BGTU, 2013, no. 1. Lesnoe hozyajstvo [BGTU proceedings. No. 1. Forestry], pp. 138–140. (In Russ.)
10. Krasnobaeva S.Yu. Luchshie klimatipy eli obyknovennoj v geograficheskih kul'turah Respubliki Tatarstan [The best climatypes of Norway spruce in provenance trails in the Republic of Tatarstan]. Lesotehnicheskij zhurnal, 2013, no. 2 (10), pp. 31–37. (In Russ.)
11. Mamaev S.A. Zakonomernosti vnutrividovoj izmenchivosti semejstva Pinaceae na Urale [Patterns of intraspecific variability of the family Pinaceae in the Urals]. DSc. (Biol.) dissertation. Sverdlovsk: Institute of Ecology of Plants and Animals UF АН SSSR. 1970. 54 p. (In Russ.)
12. Masternak K. Effect of seed collection and site altitude on the growth and genetic variability of early and late flushing provenances of Norway spruce tested in the IPTNS-IUFRO 1964/68 site in Poland. Folia Forestalia Polonica, Series A – Forestry, 2017, 59 (2), pp. 123–133.
13. Mozolevskaya E.G., Katayev O.A., Sokolova E.S. Metody lesopatologicheskogo obsledovaniya ochagov stvolovykh vreditelej i boleznej lesa [Methods of forest pathological survey of locus of stem pests and forest diseases]. Moscow: Forest Industrial, 1984. 152 p. (In Russ.)
14. Nakvasina E.N., Prozherina N.A., Dyomina N.A. Izuchenie reaktsii potomstva eli raznogo geograficheskogo proiskhozhdeniya v sisteme «genotip-sreda» na Evropejskom severe Rossii [Study of response of spruce progenies from different geographical origins in «genotype-environment» system in the European North of Russia]. Izvestia Sankt-Peterburgskoj Lesotehniceskoj Akademii, 2017, iss. 221, pp. 145–161. (In Russ.)
15. Nikolaeva M.A., Pelevina N.N. Sravnitelʼnaya otsenka klimatipov eli v geograficheskih kulʼturah Leningradskoj oblasti [Comparative evaluation of spruce climatypes in provenance trials of the Leningrad region]. Trudy Sankt-Peterburgskogo NII lesnogo hozyajstva [Saint-Petersburg forestry research institute proceedings], vol. 2 (3), pp. 119–128. (In Russ.)
16. Nikolaeva M.A., Faizulin D.Kh., Potokin A.Ph., Jamaleev O.А. Comparative evaluation of preservation and growth of spruce climatypes based on long-term provenance trails in Russia. Folia Forestalia Polonica. Series A – Forestry, 2014, 56 (1), Pp. 56–67.
17. Nikolaeva М.А., Varentsova E.Yu. Fitopatologicheskoe sostoyanie i sohrannostʼ eli v geograficheskih kulʼturah Lyubanskogo lesnichestva Leningradskoj oblasti [Phytopatological status and preservation of spruce in provenance trials of the Lyubansky Forest District of Leningrad Region]. Izvestia Sankt-Peterburgskoj Lesotehniceskoj Akademii, 2019, iss. 228, pp. 216–233. (In Russ.)
18. Nikolaeva M.A., Zhigunov А.В. Fenologicheskie i reproduktivnye osobennosti eli v geograficheskih kulʼturah Leningradskoj oblasti [Phenological and reproductive features of spruce in geographical plantations of the Leningrad region]. Lesovedenie [Russian Journal of Forest Science], 2012, no. 2, pp. 35–46. (In Russ.)
19. Norway spruce in the Conservation of Forest Ecosistems in Europe. The results of the IUFRO experimental tests series: 1938/39, 1964/68, 1972 and others: Proceeding of Conference. September 13–15, 2012. Kraków – Wisła, Beskid Montains, Poland. 2012. 110 p.
20. Orlov M.M. Lesnaya vspomogatelʼnaya knizhka dlya taksatsii i tehnicheskih raschyotov. 8-e pererab. izd. [Forest auxiliary book for taxation and technical calculation. 8th revision edition]. M.-L.: Gos. izd. s/h i kolhozno-koop. lit., 1931. 736 p. (In Russ.)
21. Popov P.P. El' evropejskaya i sibirskaya: struktura, integratsiya i differentsiatsiya populyatsionnyh system [Spruce Norway and Siberian: structure, integration and differentiation of the population systems]. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 2005. 231 p. (in Russ.)
22. Pravdin L.F. El' evropeyskaya i el' sibirskaya v SSSR [Picea abies (L.) Karsten and Picea obovata Ledebour in the USSR]. M.: Nauka, 1975. 178 p. (In Russ.)
23. Raevsky B.V., Ilyinov A.A. Rost i sohrannostʼ geograficheskih kulʼtur razlichnyh vidov eli v Karelii [Growth and safety of provenance trials of different spruce species in Karelia]. Lesnoe hozyajstvo [Forestry], 2002, no. 6, pp. 37–39. (In Russ.)
24. Shutyaev A.M. Izmenchivostʼ hvojnyh vidov v ispytatelʼnyh kulʼturah Tsentralʼnogo Chernozemʼya [The Variability of coniferous species in the test plantations of the Central Black Earth Region]. Moscow, 2007. 296 p. (In Russ.)
25. Shutyaev A.M. 2011. Kakim bytʼ lesnomu semenovodstvu v XXI veke (Knigaobzor) [What is forest seed production in the ХХI century (Book-survey)]. Voronezh: Istoki, 248 p. (In Russ.)
26. Terentiev V.I., Milutin L.I. Osobennosti rosta vidov i klimatipov eli v geograficheskih kulʼturah (yuzhnotaezhnye rajony Krasnoyarskogo kraya) [Features of the growth of species and climatypes of spruce in provenance trials (southern taiga regions of the Krasnoyarsk Territory)]. Aktualʼnye problem lesnogo kompleksa [Actual problems of the forest complex]. Bryansk: BGITU, 2008, pp. 133–136. (In Russ.)
27. Ujvári-Jármay É., Nagy L., Mátyás C. The IUFRO 1964/68 inventory provenance trial of Norway spruce in Nyírjes, Hungary – results and conclusions of five decades. Acta Silvatica & Lignaria Hungarica, 2016, vol. 12 (Special Edition). 178 p.
28. Uvarova N.I. Ispolʼzovanie geograficheskoj izmenchivosti hvojnyh na Severo-Zapade RSFSR [Using the geographical variability of conifers in the North-West of the RSFSR]. Guidelines. Leningrad: LenNIILH, 1983. 22 p. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Nikolaeva М.А., Zhigunov A.V., Baranov N.I. Influence of geographical origin of spruce seeds on the condition and growth of 45-year-old stands in the Leningrad region. Izvestia Sankt-Peterburgskoj lesotehniceskoj akademii. 2023;(246):104-125. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21266/2079-4304.2023.246.104-125